Stocks and bonds move in tandem. However, the TLT bond ETF has been falling as the S&P has been rising. Over time, this divergence will change, the gap will shrink in the future. For years, the S&P and bonds were in fact moving in tandem, but around 2024 they separated (S&P up, TLT down). It's a healthy market for the two to move in synch.
We have the classic situation with the market climbing a wall of worry, and there's no shortage of things to worry about. Middle East rocket fire, suspension (but not cancellation) of tariffs, US budget bill. Nevertheless, the market trudges higher, buoyed with some support from corporate earnings but mostly by improving sentiment (waning fear and panic from April).
Over time markets make higher highs, punctuated by short and sharp drawdowns that test the mettle of investors.
There was a lot of frenetic trading activity late Q1 and early Q2. That's been to the benefit of some businesses such as owners of stock exchanges, investment banks, brokerages. You're right though, it does wear out investors, especially when they keep getting head fakes and kneejerk reactions that are frequently misinformation.
Investors would do well do learn the lesson of focusing on the fundamentals and owning good businesses. Don't bury your head in the sand on geopolitics, but don't be ruled by them. Shifting sands shift often. Easier to build robust portfolios that can weather macro headwinds.
Right. What really took out some of the fear premium on hostilities was that, going into last weekend, the price of oil already had $10-15 of geopolitical risk baked in. But then the US waded in and dropped bombs, and the results of that are conflicting.
Latest relief rally in equity markets, especially in the US, is prompted by the very tepid, feeble, symbolic response by Iran to those strikes. Seems to have taken the worst-case scenario (strikes on oil infrastructure or closing of the Strait of Hormuz) off the table. Those events would have been very negative for the global economy and risk assets.
His firm owns 3 in their dividend-growers mandate. Canadian banks are a cornerstone of a growth and income portfolio. Secular outperformers of the TSX. Dividends typically grow 6-8% a year on an average 3-3.5% dividend yield. Over a cycle, this gives you good line of sight to low-double-digit total shareholder return; the oligopoly of the 6 makes this sustainable. Stable, well managed, well governed, diversified.
Will pull all sorts of levers to overcome economic headwinds. He expects high single-digit earnings growth this year, notwithstanding the housing market.
The Benefits of Long Term Investing: Lower costs and taxes
Long-term investors make fewer transactions, which means lower brokerage fees, bid/ask slippage and commissions. For U.S. investors, long term gains are taxed more favourably than short-term gains (not an issue for Canadian investors). Frequent buying and selling in day trading can result in substantial costs that erode profits. But it is the taxes that hurt the most. If you have a successful day trade, that’s great. But if you are in a 50 per cent tax bracket, because of capital gains taxes, you now have about 25 per ent less capital deployed in the market than a long-term investor. This reduced level of capital is a giant disadvantage to traders. Long term investors simply compound their capital and pay no taxes (other than on dividends) until their position is sold.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free
Equity risk premium compares earnings yield on the S&P 500 with the bond yields, and the bond yields have been a bit lower in the past 3-4 weeks. Effectively, equities are yielding as much as bonds. Historically, over the last 3 decades, that's been a harbinger of fairly pedestrian returns over the next 12 months.
We can debate the economy and tariffs, but the starting point is that valuations for equities (particularly those south of the border) are expensive.
Absolutely. Valuations are a terrible indicator of short-term returns, but very good indicators of long-term returns. In the short term, the market's a popularity contest. That contest can go on for a very long time.
If we go back to the tech bubble in the 1990s, Greenspan talked about "rational exuberance" in 1996 and the market didn't peak until almost 2000.
We're less than 2 weeks away from July 9, which is the 90-day reprieve from "liberation day". Who knows what will happen then? He has no idea how you strike trade deals in 2 weeks. There will be continued noise and friction within the whole system. We're seeing things slowing down.
He's not a huge one for using what the economy does to predict what the stock market's going to do. It typically works the other way around. But here we are pretty much where we started the year for the S&P. The TSX is up nicely. Starting to feel as though a lot of the good news is baked in, so perhaps we might just pause for breath.
Initial reactions by markets to tariffs were very spiky. But we've gotten used to it now. Yes, some businesses will be impacted. But investors tend to think longer term. At some point we'll come through this and get on with our lives.
Markets. Has been quite conservative for a while and had his concerns on terms of equity exposure at the lower end of his policy ranges. Bond market portends weaker times. We wouldn’t be getting the QE 3 to the degree we have if there wasn’t a lot of concerns. Has a large cap bias versus small caps. Expects to see more earnings revisions. Cash holdings for clients is in the 25%-40% range.